ChatGPT Plugin

OreLaw

Research WA mining records

Brand: Unknown

Category: Pending
Primary Subcategory: Pending

Integration details

Description

OreLaw is a research tool for lawyers, mining professionals and researchers working with public Western Australian mining and land records. Use it in ChatGPT to find mining tenements and their current holders, search published Warden's Court decisions, check court listings, and retrieve public heritage-site and pastoral-station records. Its main purpose is to help users find and summarise public records for legal and resources research. OreLaw provides read-only access to its registry, requires no account or authentication, and does not process payments. It does not provide legal advice, change official records or file documents. Records and summaries may be incomplete or out of date; verify important facts and deadlines against the underlying authoritative sources. Heritage-site sensitivity and restriction flags describe the site, not the confidentiality of the published information returned.

Integration type: Plugin
Verification status: Not applicable
Platform: ChatGPT
Category: Pending
Primary Subcategory: Pending
Secondary Subcategories: None listed
Brand: Unknown
Access: No account required
First tracked: 2026-10-22
Tool count: 25
Geography: US

Agent DiscoverabilityChatGPT Plugin Discovery Score

ChatGPT organic discovery is live

Your score is coming

ChatGPT now suggests Plugins on its own when they match a user's request.Your Plugin Discovery Score measures how often yours appears, and it will show here as soon as it’s ready.

ChatGPT recommends Airtable when a user asks it to update a CRM. — ChatGPT surfaces Airtable because it matches the user's request.

Primary Subcategory

Competitive lineup

No Primary Subcategory assigned yetOnce OreLaw has a Primary Subcategory, the Plugins and Connectors it competes with will appear here with their scores.

Tools

25 tools agents can invoke

Compare two to ten tenements side by side for a reporting year: expenditure per hectare, percentage of the minimum expenditure met, drawn and register area, and an under-use score with its weighted components. The score is a research sorting aid, not evidence of non-compliance.
Export the same per-tenement expenditure and under-use metrics as `metrics` as CSV text for a reporting year, optionally limited to one holder's tenements.
Fetch one Warden's Court decision by its citation, e.g. `[2026] WAMW 17`, with its full markdown summary, structured summary sections, parties, warden, location and delivery date.
Fetch one Aboriginal cultural heritage site by its ACH identifier, including its source geometry and register properties.
Fetch a holder by stable ID and a paginated, searchable list of their tenements.
Subscribable iCalendar feed of recent and coming key dates for a holder's live tenements.
Subscribable iCalendar feed of a holder's recent and coming Warden's Court hearings.
The holder's current tenements and their co-holders, published decision mentions, retained court listings, and native-title claims/determination holders from the register.
Fetch one Warden's Court hearing listing by dealing ID, with its parties, matter, hearing time, court and the original source fields.
Matter timeline: each schedule the listing feed has carried for this dealing, oldest first. History starts when Ore Law began tracking it; earlier changes were not retained.
Fetch one pastoral station by its pastoral lease number, including its source geometry and register properties.
Fetch a tenement and its ownership records, including holder names and shares.
Subscribable iCalendar feed of one tenement's key dates.
Distinct, non-blank source values across all tenements, not the current result page.
Indicative rent, expenditure, reporting, renewal and expiry dates, with compliance flags.
Find what a tenement's mapped boundary overlaps: other mining tenements (with their current holders), Aboriginal heritage sites and pastoral stations, with overlap area in hectares and as a percentage of the drawn tenement.
List the identifiers of every tenement held by a holder (by holder ID), with the holder's name and a `[west, south, east, north]` bounding box around their mapped tenements.
List published Warden's Court of Western Australia decisions, newest first, with parties, result and a short excerpt. Filter by citation, parties, result, warden, location, delivery year or date range, a tenement mentioned in the decision, or a holder ID that appears as a party.
List Aboriginal cultural heritage sites from the WA ACH register, ordered by name. Search names, identifiers and regions, or filter by region, place status, place type and sensitivity flags.
Search holder names or ACNs, ordered by name, with their number of tenements.
List Warden's Court hearing listings (the court's published hearing schedule) by hearing time. Only today's and future hearings are returned unless `include_past` is true. Filter by reference, applicants, respondents, matter or list type, court, warden, hearing dates or tenement.
List Western Australian pastoral stations (pastoral leases), ordered by station name. Search lease numbers, station names and regions, or filter by region, station name or lease number.
List tenements ordered by identifier, searching identifiers, districts and holder names. Each row carries its current holders so the table renders without follow-up requests.
Expenditure and under-use metrics for every tenement in a reporting year, keyed by tenement identifier, optionally limited to one holder's tenements. Each entry has expenditure per hectare, percentage of the minimum expenditure met, drawn and register area, and an under-use score; the score is a research sorting aid, not evidence of non-compliance.
Search published Warden's Court decisions by free-text query, ranked by relevance. Use this for questions about legal issues, outcomes or reasoning; `lexical` mode needs no network and `hybrid` adds semantic matching. Optionally narrow by warden or delivery year.

FAQs

OreLaw ChatGPT Plugin FAQ

How the directory, categories and Discoverability Score work.

Read the methodology

How do I improve OreLaw's ChatGPT Plugin discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.