Granola
Granola MCP connects your meeting history to Codex so your assistant can pull real context from past conv...
- Category
- Productivity
- Primary Subcategory
- Pending
Integration details
Description
Granola MCP connects your meeting history to Codex so your assistant can pull real context from past conversations while you work. Use MCP when you're already working on something bigger: - Writing PRDs or proposals: Pull customer feedback, stakeholder input, and decisions from relevant meetings directly into your draft - Building presentations or reports: Combine insights from multiple conversations with your other research and data - Coding with context: Give your AI the project background, requirements, and technical decisions discussed in planning meetings - Strategic analysis: Merge meeting insights with documents, data, and other sources for comprehensive analysis How it works: Your AI assistant can search your Granola meetings by topic, person, company, or timeframe - then cite specific conversations in its responses. No more switching tabs to find "what the customer said" or "when we decided that." The difference: Instead of copy-pasting meeting notes into prompts, your AI pulls exactly what it needs from your meeting history automatically. You stay focused on the work, not the research or context.
- Integration type
- Plugin
- Verification status
- Not applicable
- Platform
- ChatGPT
- Primary Subcategory
- Pending
- Secondary Subcategories
- None listed
- Brand
- Granola
- Access
- Account required
- First tracked
- 2026-05-26
- Tool count
- 0
- Geography
- US
The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.
Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.
Get alerts for Granola
Get updates when Granola’s Discoverability Score or category rank changes.
ChatGPT Plugin Discovery Score
ChatGPT Plugin discovery is coming soon
ChatGPT can surface a Plugin when it matches a user's request.Your Plugin Discovery Score measures how often yours appears.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
What discovery looks like

Competitive lineup
0 tools agents can invoke
No tools are exposed by this ChatGPT Plugin in the latest snapshot.
How do I improve a ChatGPT Plugin's discoverability?
The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.
Where is this profile measured?
This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.