- Brand
- OpenKrill
- Category
- Developer Tools
- Primary Subcategory
- Developer Docs & Reference Search
Integration details
Description
Check the facts a developer asks for again and again: when a software version reaches end of life, whether the runtimes a repository pins are still supported, what an open-source license is, whether a web feature works in a browser, what an RFC says about itself and what changed between two versions of a package. Ask "is Node.js 20 still supported?", "is anything in this repo past end of life?", "is the MIT license OSI approved?", "can I use CSS container queries in Safari?", "which RFC obsoletes RFC 2616?" or "what changed in express between 4.18.2 and 5.1.0?". For a repository, pass the files that pin runtimes (package.json, .nvmrc, .python-version, pyproject.toml, go.mod, a Dockerfile or compose file, .tool-versions, mise.toml, .ruby-version, a Gemfile, composer.json or global.json) and get one row per runtime with its end-of-life date, days left, latest patch and the next supported cycle. It reads five public sources: endoflife.date for release cycles and support dates, the SPDX License List for license identifiers and OSI and FSF status, webstatus.dev for Baseline status and the first browser version that supports a web feature, the RFC Editor and IETF Datatracker for RFC status, abstracts and obsoleting links, and GitHub releases and changelog files for the notes of each release in a version range. Every answer names its source and the date of the data. endoflife.date is maintained by volunteers, so confirm a date with the vendor before a contract or compliance decision. A license answer identifies a license and does not say what it lets you do: it is not legal advice. It does not scan packages for vulnerabilities or health: use the Package Health Check plugin for that. It stores nothing about you: answers are cached for a few hours and the only lasting record is a daily count of calls per tool.
- Integration type
- Plugin
- Verification status
- Not applicable
- Platform
- ChatGPT
- Primary Subcategory
- Developer Docs & Reference Search
- Secondary Subcategories
- None listed
- Brand
- OpenKrill
- Access
- No account required
- First tracked
- 2026-10-28
- Tool count
- 8
- Market
- US
The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.
Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.
Your score is coming
ChatGPT now suggests Plugins on its own when they match a user's request.Your Plugin Discovery Score measures how often yours appears, and it will show here as soon as it’s ready.
What discovery looks like

Get alerts for Dev Facts Check
Get updates when Dev Facts Check’s Discoverability Score or category rank changes.
Competing in ChatGPT Developer Docs & Reference Search
View Category8 tools agents can invoke
Dev Facts Check ChatGPT Plugin FAQ
How the directory, categories and Discoverability Score work.
Read the methodologyHow do I improve Dev Facts Check's ChatGPT Plugin discoverability?
The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.
What are Dev Facts Check alternatives on ChatGPT?
As of 2026-10-28, Dev Facts Check competes with 3GPP Scout, @imqueue, Amtstools, Arez, Autodesk Product Help, CliDeck Network Knowledge, Context7, Cyber Library and 18 more in ChatGPT Developer Docs & Reference Search, ranked by public Discoverability Score.
Where is this profile measured?
This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.