- Brand
- Manusights
- Category
- Education
- Primary Subcategory
- Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants
Integration details
Description
Check any citation, anytime: a reference list in your draft, sources an AI assistant suggested (including ChatGPT in this conversation), a literature review, or the references in a paper you are reviewing. And check your manuscript before the journal does. Check references: paste references or ask ChatGPT to check the ones in your file or earlier in the conversation. Each reference is looked up in Crossref, the DOI registry and Retraction Watch and comes back with its source and check time: resolves, registered outside Crossref, retracted, expression of concern, correction issued, journal flagged, points to a different record, not found, or could not be checked. Only the references are sent, never your manuscript. Journal AI policies: ask what a journal allows on AI authorship, disclosure statements, AI-generated images, and reviewers' or editors' use of AI. Answers come from Manusights' dated record of the official policy page, with that page linked; when a record is out of date or the page could not be fully read, it says so and links the page instead. Where Manusights has measured it, you also get the journal's typical time from submission to acceptance. Manuscript preview: attach a manuscript (PDF, Word, ODT, RTF, TXT, Markdown or LaTeX, up to 50 MB) for a readiness score, a verdict and the main risks a reviewer is likely to raise. You can also read reviews already on your Manusights account. For researchers, students and reviewers who cite papers. Reference checks and journal AI-policy lookups work without an account. Manuscript previews and your saved reviews need a Manusights account; you can sign in with Google, an emailed link or a password. Limitations: checks report what the sources hold. They cannot tell whether a reference supports a claim, and "could not be checked" (common for books, theses and conference papers without a DOI) is not a sign of a problem. "Not found" means the sources hold no record, which can also be a typo. Up to 100 references per check. Journal policies cover the journals in Manusights' records. Manusights does not write or rewrite manuscripts.
- Integration type
- Plugin
- Verification status
- Not applicable
- Platform
- ChatGPT
- Primary Subcategory
- Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants
- Secondary Subcategories
- None listed
- Brand
- Manusights
- Access
- Account optional
- First tracked
- 2026-10-16
- Tool count
- 5
- Geography
- US
The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.
Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.
Your score is coming
ChatGPT now suggests Plugins on its own when they match a user's request.Your Plugin Discovery Score measures how often yours appears, and it will show here as soon as it’s ready.
What discovery looks like

Get alerts for Manusights
Get updates when Manusights’s Discoverability Score or category rank changes.
Competing in ChatGPT Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants
View Category5 tools agents can invoke
Manusights ChatGPT Plugin FAQ
How the directory, categories and Discoverability Score work.
Read the methodologyHow do I improve Manusights's ChatGPT Plugin discoverability?
The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.
What are Manusights alternatives on ChatGPT?
As of 2026-10-16, Manusights competes with Aarth, Agentic Search by Liner, AllNutrition, alphaXiv, Anatomy, Article Galaxy, Atlante Clinico, Compendia Bibliotheca and 15 more in ChatGPT Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants, ranked by public Discoverability Score.
Where is this profile measured?
This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.