Tastewise
Insights for Food & Beverage
- Category
- Data & Analytics
- Primary Subcategory
- Sector, Macro & Alternative Data Intelligence
Integration details
Description
Tastewise Insights is an agent that helps food and beverage professionals discover trends, consumer needs, and market insights through natural conversation in ChatGPT. Key Features: - Ask questions about food trends in natural language - Get insights on trending ingredients, dishes, and beverages - Understand consumer motivations and purchasing drivers - Explore market data across more than 60 countries - Receive data-driven analysis powered by Tastewise's food intelligence platform
- Integration type
- Plugin
- Verification status
- Not applicable
- Platform
- ChatGPT
- Primary Subcategory
- Sector, Macro & Alternative Data Intelligence
- Secondary Subcategories
- None listed
- Brand
- Tastewise
- Access
- Account required
- First tracked
- 2026-07-23
- Tool count
- 30
- Geography
- US
The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.
Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.
Get alerts for Tastewise
Get updates when Tastewise’s Discoverability Score or category rank changes.
ChatGPT Plugin Discovery Score
ChatGPT Plugin discovery is coming soon
ChatGPT can surface a Plugin when it matches a user's request.Your Plugin Discovery Score measures how often yours appears.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
What discovery looks like

Competing in ChatGPT Sector, Macro & Alternative Data Intelligence
View Category30 tools agents can invoke
The intake guide for commissioning a Tastewise report: what to ask the requester, the allowed values for category, audience, market, brief_requested and data_origin, and which fields are mandatory. Call it before brief_submit, every time — the allowed values are live, not a fixed list you can remember. Not an analysis tool: it returns no market data. Takes no arguments. Brief type is deliberately absent — a Tastewise analyst assigns it after intake.
brief_get_guide
Monthly AVERAGE PRICE of matching menu items per slice in one market, in that market's currency. Each series also carries its average share of matching locations over the period and the year-on-year change in PRICE — this is the one foodservice tool whose growth is a price move rather than a share move. The widget labels the two Menu Share and Menu Growth, as the dashboard does. Use to compare price levels across segments — which chains price a dish highest, how QSR and fast casual differ. Not for share of voice (foodservice_trend_location_share), counts of locations or items (foodservice_trend_item_count), nor for how one term's price moved with no breakdown asked for — that is foodservice_get_trend_performance, which returns a single price series instead of one per slice. Sorted most expensive first; the most recent month's price is each line's last point, so it is not repeated as a field of its own.
foodservice_trend_avg_price
Ingredient analytics for the menus matching a search in one market: per-ingredient menu, recipe and social counts, monthly and yearly menu change, channel split and lifecycle stage. Use for on-menu ingredient questions — the ingredient mix of matcha menus, what sits on taco menus by chain. Not for the consumer/social side (social_list_ingredients_ranked), nor for whole menu items (foodservice_list_menu_items). Draws the dashboard's Menu ingredients table — menu share, yearly change and index per ingredient, highest share first.
foodservice_list_ingredients
Monthly LOCATION-share per slice for a search in one market — the percent of matching locations that fall in each slice, which sums to about 100 across the slices of a month. Each series also carries the year-on-year change in that share. The widget labels them Share and Share Growth, as the dashboard does. Use for how operator composition shifted over time — gained or lost share, share trajectory, which states are gaining. Not for item counts (foodservice_trend_item_count), price (foodservice_trend_avg_price), nor for one term's own trajectory with no slices to compare (foodservice_get_trend_performance). Slices with under 24 months of history are dropped, so fewer than five series is normal and the slices drawn here need not match those of any other card.
foodservice_trend_location_share
Monthly menu-item COUNT per slice for a search in one market. Counts are averaged across delivery platforms. Each series also carries, beside the line the chart draws, its average share of matching locations over the period and the year-on-year change in THAT SHARE — not in the count. Read those two when asked which slice is gaining or losing ground, rather than differencing the line. Use to compare two or more slices over time — chains against chains, states against states. Not for share trajectory (foodservice_trend_location_share) nor price (foodservice_trend_avg_price) — those are separate measures, not options here — and not for how one term evolved with no breakdown asked for, which is foodservice_get_trend_performance. `dimension` decides what a series is.
foodservice_trend_item_count
The actual menu items matching a search in one market, tagged: best-sellers, LTOs, recently added or removed, promotions, recent price moves, plus K-12 and c-store items in the US. Use when the user wants the items themselves — names, prices, operators. Not for counts (foodservice_get_overview), per-operator KPIs (foodservice_rank_by_menu_depth) or ingredient analytics (foodservice_list_ingredients). Draws the dashboard's On the menu card: nine items per tab, one tab per tag, with School Menus and C-Stores Menus in the USA only. One item can appear under several tabs.
foodservice_list_menu_items
The whole Operator Insights landscape for a term in one market: source volume, the 24-month trend, four operator breakdowns, menu items and menu ingredients, as eight panels with their figures. Use for the restaurant-side picture of a topic, not one figure. Not for a single total (foodservice_get_overview), nor for one angle already known, which foodservice_rank_by_locations or foodservice_trend_item_count answers faster. Fixed panels, no query parsing: one question always draws one dashboard. `digest` is your only copy of the numbers.
foodservice_get_dashboard
Top-line totals for the menus matching a search in one market: menu items, restaurants and chains, plus school and c-store totals in the US. Use when the user asks how many, how big, or for a single total — the short path, one call. Not for the whole operator landscape at once (foodservice_get_dashboard), for trends (foodservice_trend_item_count), per-operator breakdowns (foodservice_rank_by_locations) or the items themselves (foodservice_list_menu_items). Draws the dashboard's source-volume strip: counts only, no ranking, no share, no growth.
foodservice_get_overview
Chains, states, business types, cuisines or cities ranked by how many LOCATIONS carry the search term. Each row also carries that slice's share of matching locations, averaged over the period, and the year-on-year change in THAT SHARE — not in the count. The widget labels them Menu Share and Menu Growth, as the dashboard does. Use for top chains for a term, or the top states for a dish — questions about reach and how many outlets serve it, never about how many items each carries. Not for menu depth per operator (foodservice_rank_by_menu_depth), nor for pricing (foodservice_trend_avg_price). Point-in-time ranking only. `dimension` decides what a row is.
foodservice_rank_by_locations
Chains, states, business types, cuisines or cities ranked by how many matching menu items each carries per operator — menu depth. Each row also carries location share and its yearly growth. The widget labels them Menu Share and Menu Growth, as the dashboard does. Use when the user asks who has the biggest menu for a term, or ranks anything by how many matching items each one carries. Not for ranking by number of locations (foodservice_rank_by_locations), nor for movement over time (foodservice_trend_item_count). Point-in-time ranking only. `dimension` decides what a row is.
foodservice_rank_by_menu_depth
Within-region share of menus mentioning the search term, one row per region, as region code and percent. Use for map or where-is-it-served questions at state or region level. Not for cities — there is no city granularity here; use foodservice_rank_by_locations with dimension=cities. Not for over-indexing either: this is raw within-region share, not share-with versus share-without. Regions with no data are dropped. Entries the market could not place on a region are NOT dropped silently: they are counted in `unplaced`, whose share_percent belongs to no region and must be stated rather than ignored. That figure is small everywhere except FR and ES, where most of the answer lands there and the regional picture is not usable. USA, UK, CA, AU, DE, FR, IN, BR, MX, ES only.
foodservice_list_regions
How ONE term has moved over 24 months in one market, or inside one slice of it: menu presence, social presence, item count, items per operator and average price — five monthly series, each with its year-over-year growth and a written summary. ONE slice per call. Not for comparing two or more segments, chains, states or cuisines against each other: when the question asks which of them moved more, grew faster or priced higher, use foodservice_trend_item_count for counts, foodservice_trend_avg_price for price and foodservice_trend_location_share for share, each returning one series per slice. Use it when a single term is asked about with no breakdown: the market-wide price of a dish and how it moved, how a term grew inside one named segment, or whether it is still rising. Nor for the social side on its own (social_get_trend_performance). Draws the dashboard's Trend performance card, one tab per series. Each tab states its own unit — they are not all percentages — and a business_type slice leaves the menus and social tabs market-wide.
foodservice_get_trend_performance
The brands selling a searched product in one market, ranked by the metric you pick, with a written narrative. Use for which brands lead a retail category, who is launching the most new SKUs, or which brands price highest. Not for the shops that carry them (retail_rank_retailers), nor for the individual products (retail_list_products). This is e-commerce shelf data, not social conversation — for who is talking about a brand, use the social_list_* tools. Ranked rows only, no time series.
retail_rank_brands
The ingredients and flavours in the packaged products matching a search in one market, ranked by the metric you pick, with a written narrative. Use for what is in the products on shelf, which flavours sell most, and which are arriving on new launches. Not for the consumer/social side either (social_list_ingredients_ranked), nor for restaurant menus (foodservice_list_ingredients). Ranked rows only, no time series.
retail_rank_ingredients
The claims printed on the PACKAGING of products sold online in one market — organic, gluten free, high protein and the like — ranked by the metric you pick, with a written narrative. Use for what packs claim, which claims appear most on shelf, and which are appearing on new launches. Not for which claims come up when people talk about a food — that is social_list_consumer_motivations, and a question about the claims around a product, rather than on its packs, belongs there. Nor for the consumer-need categories those sit in (claims_list_categories). Ranked rows only, no time series.
retail_rank_claims
The actual products on shelf matching a search in one market — names, brands, prices and review data. Use when the user wants to see the products themselves rather than a count or a ranking: what is being sold, at what price, under which brand. Not for how many there are (retail_get_overview), nor for a ranking of brands, retailers or categories (retail_rank_brands, retail_rank_retailers, retail_rank_categories). One page of products, the same rows the shelf widget shows.
retail_list_products
The retailers and e-commerce platforms carrying a searched product in one market, ranked by the metric you pick, with a written narrative. Use for where a product sells, which chains stock the most of it, or which price it highest. This is the shops, not their shoppers — for who buys, use social_list_audiences. Not for the brands on the shelf (retail_rank_brands), nor for the whole shelf drawn at once (retail_get_dashboard). Ranked rows only, no time series.
retail_rank_retailers
The retail sales categories a searched product sits in, ranked by the metric you pick, with a written narrative. Use for which aisles or shelf categories a product belongs to, and which of them carry the most of it. Not for the categories behind a social trend, with their share of conversation — that is social_list_categories, a different dataset. Not for the food-category taxonomy itself either (taxonomy_list_categories). Ranked rows only, no time series.
retail_rank_categories
A rendered multi-panel shelf dashboard for a broad e-commerce question, drawn in one shot with the figures behind it. Use when the user wants a product's whole shelf landscape — the panels show it, your answer reads it. Not for one number or one angle: retail_get_overview answers how big the shelf is, and retail_rank_brands or retail_list_products answers one ranking. Returns the panel layout and `digest`, the same figures as text — your only copy.
retail_get_dashboard
Top-line shelf totals for a search in one market: how many sales categories, online products, brands and retailers carry it, recent launches, and the average price. Use when the user asks how big the shelf is, how many products or brands sit on it, or the average price. Not for the products themselves (retail_list_products), for a ranking (retail_rank_brands, retail_rank_retailers, retail_rank_categories), nor for the whole shelf drawn at once — that is retail_get_dashboard. Six numbers, no rows, no ranking, no growth.
retail_get_overview
The consumer audiences behind a social trend in one market — generations, behavioural cohorts, a retailer's shoppers, a chain's customers — with a written narrative. Use when the user asks who is driving a topic, or which cohort over-indexes on it. Not for why they choose it (social_list_consumer_motivations), nor for an audience curve over time (social_get_trend_performance). Not for the shops themselves either — this is WHO shops, not WHICH retailers stock a product, which is retail_rank_retailers. Returns up to 10 by share. Can come back empty for a sparse topic.
social_list_audiences
Ranked food categories behind a social trend in one market, with a written narrative summarising them. Use when the user asks which categories drive a topic, or which are growing or declining year over year. Not for named dishes (social_list_dishes_ranked), ingredients (social_list_ingredients_ranked), audiences (social_list_audiences) or claims (social_list_consumer_motivations). This is conversation share, not the retail shelf — for the sales categories a product sits in, use retail_rank_categories. Returns up to 10 by social share, highest first; shares do not sum to 100. Can come back empty for a sparse topic.
social_list_categories
The claims and dietary motivations behind a social trend in one market — vegan, high-protein, gluten-free, keto and the like — with a written narrative. Use when the user asks why people reach for a topic, which diets and claims are growing around it, or which claims come up in conversation about it — named claims like vegan, keto or high protein included. Not for who those people are (social_list_audiences), for movement over time (social_get_trend_performance), nor for the need categories those claims fall under (claims_list_categories). This measures what people say; for what is printed on the packaging, use retail_rank_claims. Returns up to 10 claims ranked by volume, or 7 when the query implies a line chart.
social_list_consumer_motivations
A rendered multi-panel dashboard for a broad social-trend question, drawn in one shot, together with the figures behind it so you can analyse them. Use when the user wants a topic's landscape — the panels show it, and your answer reads it. Not for one specific number or one angle: call the matching social_list_* / social_get_* tool instead of drawing eight panels to answer one question. Returns the panel layout for the view, and `digest` — the same figures as text, which is the only copy you get.
social_get_dashboard
How much consumer data sits behind a social trend in one market: people, social posts, recipes, dishes and restaurants mentioning it. Use when the user asks how much data a topic rests on, or how big its conversation is. Not for growth (social_get_trend_performance), for the whole landscape at once (social_get_dashboard), for operator menu totals (foodservice_get_overview) or the shelf (retail_get_overview). Five counts, no ranking, no growth; a count the source lacks shows as a dash.
social_get_overview
Named dishes grouped by maturity stage — early, emerging, trending, mature, declining — for a social trend in one market. Use when the user asks what is emerging versus fading, or what the next dish for a topic looks like. Not for one flat ranked list (social_list_dishes_ranked) or for ingredients (social_list_ingredients_by_lifecycle). Up to 7 dishes per stage, ranked by social share. Carries no narrative — the title is fixed, matching the platform widget.
social_list_dishes_by_lifecycle
The named dishes carrying a social trend in one market, with a written narrative. Use when the user asks which dishes are trending for a topic, or wants the leading dishes in a category. Not for how dishes spread across maturity stages (social_list_dishes_by_lifecycle), for ingredients (social_list_ingredients_ranked) or for categories (social_list_categories). Returns up to 10 rows ranked by the metric the query implies. The dish name sits in the `ingredient` field — an upstream schema alias, not a mistake.
social_list_dishes_ranked
Named ingredients grouped by maturity stage — early, emerging, trending, mature, declining — for a social trend in one market. Use when the user asks which ingredients are emerging versus fading, or what the next ingredient for a topic looks like. Not for one flat ranked list (social_list_ingredients_ranked) or for dishes (social_list_dishes_by_lifecycle). Up to 7 ingredients per stage, ranked by social share. Carries no narrative — the title is fixed, matching the platform widget.
social_list_ingredients_by_lifecycle
The named ingredients carrying a social trend in one market on the consumer side, with a written narrative. Use when the user asks which ingredients are trending for a topic, or wants the leading ingredients in a category. Not for maturity stages (social_list_ingredients_by_lifecycle), for whole dishes (social_list_dishes_ranked), for restaurant-side menu analytics, which this surface does not expose at all, nor for what is in packaged products on shelf (retail_rank_ingredients). Returns up to 10 rows ranked by the metric the query implies.
social_list_ingredients_ranked
How a social trend performs over time in one market, across five tabs — social mentions, menu penetration, recipe adoption, forecast, audience — each a chronological series, with a written narrative. Use when the user asks whether a topic is growing or declining, or wants a forecast. Not for ranked breakdowns, which every other tool here returns. Always five rows, one per tab; the audience tab carries at most 3 named lines.
social_get_trend_performance
How do I improve a ChatGPT Plugin's discoverability?
The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.
What are Tastewise alternatives on ChatGPT?
As of 2026-09-28, Tastewise competes with Airside Labs Aviation Tools, Antevo Executive Brief, Carbon Arc, Corporate Weather, Energy Aspects, FashionTrendAI, Fintech Explainer, Kpler, LouisianAI, Mantic, Point Topic, Token Terminal, Traffik Yacht Radar in ChatGPT Sector, Macro & Alternative Data Intelligence, ranked by public Discoverability Score.
Where is this profile measured?
This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.