← Registry tracker

BioSkepsis

Run a full life-science literature review inside Claude and get back a citation-grounded, trust-scored brief

Category
AI
View in the Claude registry
Integration details

Description

BioSkepsis runs a full agentic life-science literature review from inside Claude and returns a citation-grounded brief. Ask a life-science research question and the connector plans the work, searches the peer-reviewed literature, reads full text where available, screens for retracted papers and questioned cell lines, and synthesizes a structured brief: a headline answer, ranked and tiered sources, sub-question coverage, and a composite Trust Index. A run executes in the background and takes several minutes, so the workflow spans a few tools. start_research_run returns a run id, get_research_status reports live progress (the current phase and papers found), and get_research_brief returns the finished brief once it is ready. list_recent_briefs and get_brief re-open earlier briefs, and create_research_feed turns a finished run into a research feed that emails you new related papers on a daily, weekly, or monthly schedule. Runs are scoped to your own BioSkepsis account and use your plan's monthly brief allowance. A run you start from Claude is also saved to your BioSkepsis account as a research chat, so you can open the full brief, inspect every source, and ask follow-up questions in the app. Built for researchers, clinicians, and R&D teams who want evidence-grounded answers with the sources shown, not unsourced prose. BioSkepsis covers 40M+ papers across the life sciences, and never trains on your data.

Integration type
Connector
Verification status
Community connector
Platform
Claude
Category
AI

The broad Category that contains the Primary Subcategory.

Primary Subcategory
Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants

The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.

Secondary Subcategories
None listed

Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.

Access
Account required
First tracked
2026-07-23
Tool count
6
Geography
US

Claude Discoverability Score

Claude Connector discovery is coming soon

Community Connectors only appear in Claude’s registry.Once verified, organic discovery begins and we can calculate your score.Read more about Community Connector verification.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

What discovery looks like

Claude showing a list of relevant Connectors in a conversation

Claude can surface verified Connectors when they match a user’s Prompt.

7 scoredVerified connectors by score · Community connectors A–Z
Primary Subcategory
1Consensus92/100
2bioRxiv32/100
3Elicit24/100
4Amass Connector16/100
5Firecrawl16/100
—BioSkepsisPending VerificationGet notified
—fastwritePending VerificationGet notified
—UndermindPending VerificationGet notified
—ValencyPending VerificationGet notified
—カーリル for AIPending VerificationGet notified
Recommended guideHow to get your Claude Connector organically discoveredFollow the practical steps agents use to find, shortlist, and choose your Connector.Read guide
Tools

6 tools agents can invoke

BioSkepsis FAQ
How do I improve a Community connector's discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are BioSkepsis alternatives on Claude?

As of 2026-09-28, BioSkepsis competes with Consensus, bioRxiv, Elicit, Amass Connector, Firecrawl, Wiley Scholar Gateway, Scite, fastwrite, Undermind, Valency, カーリル for AI in Claude Academic Literature Search & Research Assistants, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.