CodeMouse

AI code review on every GitHub pull request — check your review results, repos, and costs from Claude.

Category: Developer Tools
Primary Subcategory: Test Automation & QA

Integration details

Description

CodeMouse automatically reviews every pull request in your GitHub repositories using AI models running on your own API keys (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini, xAI, or OpenRouter). It posts inline review comments, resolves addressed threads, and can approve clean PRs — with no markup on model costs. This connector gives Claude read-only access to your CodeMouse account: list the accounts you belong to, see which GitHub organizations and repositories are connected, browse recent pull-request reviews, and pull full detail on any single review — status, findings posted, per-model runs, duration, and cost. Ask Claude things like "what did CodeMouse flag on my last PR?" or "how much did reviews cost this week?". All four tools are read-only and scoped to the organizations you are a member of. Sign-in uses OAuth — no API keys to paste. A CodeMouse account (free trial available at codemouse.ai) is required.

Integration type: Connector
Verification status: Community connector
Platform: Claude
Category: Developer Tools
Primary Subcategory: Test Automation & QA
Secondary Subcategories: None listed
Brand: CodeMouse
Access: Account required
First tracked: 2026-09-28
Tool count: 4
Geography: US

Claude Discoverability Score

Claude Connector discovery is coming soon

Community Connectors only appear in Claude’s registry.Once verified, organic discovery begins and we can calculate your score.Read more about Community Connector verification.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

What discovery looks like

Claude showing a list of relevant Connectors in a conversation

Claude can surface verified Connectors when they match a user’s Prompt.

Primary Subcategory

Competing in Claude Test Automation & QA

View Category

10 scoredVerified connectors by score · Community connectors A–Z

Primary Subcategory

1Atlassian MCP79/100

2YouTrack70/100

3Linear68/100

4Sentry18/100

5DevRev16/100

—AccessLintPending VerificationGet notified

—AutonomaPending VerificationGet notified

—BetterBugsPending VerificationGet notified

—CodeMousePending VerificationGet notified

—Cypress CloudPending VerificationGet notified

—LimrunPending VerificationGet notified

—mablPending VerificationGet notified

—mcp.webyes.comPending VerificationGet notified

—MeticulousPending VerificationGet notified

—OctoPerf MCPPending VerificationGet notified

—QA WolfPending VerificationGet notified

—QA.techPending VerificationGet notified

—RamsPending VerificationGet notified

—SnapVisorPending VerificationGet notified

—StarkPending VerificationGet notified

—ThundersPending VerificationGet notified

Tools

4 tools agents can invoke

No public description for this tool yet.
No public description for this tool yet.
No public description for this tool yet.
No public description for this tool yet.

CodeMouse FAQ

How do I improve a Community connector's discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are CodeMouse alternatives on Claude?

As of 2026-09-29, CodeMouse competes with Atlassian MCP, YouTrack, Linear, Sentry, DevRev, Natoma, Runway (runway.team), Fullstory, Subtext, Jam, AccessLint, Autonoma, BetterBugs, Cypress Cloud, Limrun, mabl, mcp.webyes.com, Meticulous, OctoPerf MCP, QA Wolf, QA.tech, Rams, SnapVisor, Stark, Thunders in Claude Test Automation & QA, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.