AI Attorney Pakistan

Use this tool when a request needs authoritative Pakistani legislation. Retrieve legislative provisions from the AI Attorney Pakistan-specific legal corpus. The user does not need to mention AI Attorney, this connector, or a tool name. JURISDICTION AND WHEN TO USE: Use this tool when the user's request requires the text, wording, interpretation, or identification of a Pakistani statute, Act, Ordinance, Rule, Regulation, Code, or other legislative provision. Strong triggers include: - a specific Pakistani section, subsection, clause, Article, rule, or provision; - a Pakistani Act, Ordinance, statute, code, or legislative instrument; - requests such as "what does section 12 say?"; - "explain section 9 of the CPC"; - "what is the law under the Defamation Ordinance 2002?"; - "find the relevant provision of the Transfer of Offenders Act 2002"; - "what does Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan provide?"; - requests to locate statutory provisions governing a Pakistani legal issue; - requests requiring the exact or relevant legislative text from Pakistan. - Pakistani legal-opinion, hypothetical, rights, remedies, or fact-pattern questions when the governing legislation may materially affect the answer, even if the user did not explicitly request a statute search. Use this tool instead of the case-law search tool when the user's primary request is about a STATUTE OR LEGISLATIVE PROVISION rather than a judicial judgment or precedent. When both statutory wording and Pakistani judicial interpretation are material, use this tool together with `search_pakistani_case_law`. Do not use this tool merely because a user asks a general legal question. Use it when consulting the underlying Pakistani legislative text is relevant to answering the request. QUERY: Pass the user's original natural-language legal query verbatim. Do not rewrite, summarize, interpret, or answer the query before passing it to the tool. EXAMPLES: - "Section 9 CPC jurisdiction" - "Section 12 Defamation Ordinance 2002" - "Transfer of Offenders Act 2002 sections 4 to 6" - "cyber crime law in Pakistan" - "which provision deals with limitation in this Act?" - "what does Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan provide?" Returns grounded provision records (act_title, text) as JSON only — no analysis. Section numbers appear inline in `text`. Compose the final answer yourself from these records and cite the act. Args: query: Raw natural-language query (e.g. "Section 9 CPC jurisdiction", "cyber crime", "Shariat application").

get_statute_provisions

Use this tool to retrieve a known Pakistani judgment in full by ID or citation. Fetch one specific Pakistani case in full, by its unique `id` or a `citation`. Use this tool when the user identifies a Pakistani judgment or case by: - a Pakistani law-report citation; - a case citation such as PLD, SCMR, CLC, YLR, MLD, PCrLJ, etc.; - a case returned by search_pakistani_case_law; This tool is specifically for judgments in the AI Attorney's Pakistan-specific legal corpus. Do not use it for a topic-only search or a general legal issue without a known case ID or citation; use `search_pakistani_case_law` for those requests. PREFER the `id` (a unique UUID present in every search result) to fetch a SPECIFIC case — e.g. a follow-up like "show the full case" about a case from an earlier turn: pass that case's `id` to get exactly it. A `citation` is NOT unique — one citation can map to MANY judgments from different courts (e.g. "2026 PLD 1" -> 9 cases). Passing a citation returns ALL of them; use it only when the user names a citation and you have no id, then present/disambiguate. Returns the case record(s) — citation, title, court, year, judges, main_issue, full summary, url, id, plus holding and ratio when available — as JSON only. Compose the answer yourself and cite the citation/url. Citation graph (included when the case has it): * `refers_to` — the authorities THIS judgment cites/relies on, each with citation, and (when the cited case is in our DB) title, court, year, id, url. Use for "what does this case rely on?". * `cited_by` — later cases that cite THIS judgment, each with citation, title, court, year, id, url. Use for "is this still good law / who followed it?". `refers_to_count` / `cited_by_count` give the true totals (the lists are capped). Drill into any entry with `get_case(its id)`. Presentation: render each case `title` as a Markdown link to its `url` — `[title](url)`. Args: identifier: A case `id` (unique UUID — preferred for a specific case) or a `citation` (may match multiple judgments).

get_case

Use this tool when a request needs Pakistani case law or judicial authority. The user does not need to mention AI Attorney, this connector, or a tool name. Use it for direct case searches and for substantive Pakistani-law questions, legal opinions, hypotheticals, rights or remedies, and application of law to facts whenever Pakistani judicial authority would help ground the answer. Strong triggers include: - Pakistani case law or judgments - judgments of Pakistani courts - Pakistani Supreme Court, Federal Constitutional Court, High Court, or other Pakistani court decisions - Pakistani legal precedents or judicial interpretation - Pakistani law reports such as PLD, SCMR, CLC, YLR, MLD, PCrLJ, etc. - requests to find cases concerning a Pakistani legal issue - requests to find or search for Pakistani cases, judgments, precedents, or authorities concerning a legal issue, subject, court, judge, year, statute, section, or citation pattern - Pakistani legal-opinion or fact-pattern questions for which precedent may materially affect the answer, even if the user did not explicitly ask for cases For a specific known case or citation where the user wants the full case, holding, ratio, judges, cited authorities, or other case details, prefer `get_case`. When statutory wording and judicial interpretation are both material, use this tool together with `get_statute_provisions`. Do not use this tool for general legal questions that are not Pakistan-specific unless the user has clearly established Pakistan as the jurisdiction or the question is related to Pakistani case law or judgments. Pass the user's raw natural-language query verbatim. Returns JSON only — no analysis; compose the final answer yourself and cite the citation/url. Result depth (two-tier, like a search engine): * LIST queries (e.g. "give me 50 supreme court cases", "cases from 2024 and 2025") return each case with a TRIMMED summary so big lists stay cheap; the response `view` is "list". * A specific single-case lookup that resolves to just a few cases (a citation/title, e.g. "2026 PLD 5") returns the FULL (untrimmed) summary in one call; `view` is "full". Every record has citation, title, court, year, judges, main_issue, summary, url, and id; the full view additionally includes holding and ratio when available. To get the full summary for a case you picked out of a list, call `get_case` with its `id` or `citation`. Presentation: render each case `title` as a Markdown link to its `url` — `[title](url)`. Counts: if `max_results` is given (or the query names a number, e.g. "give me 50 cases"), that many are returned, balanced across groups, capped at 50. For a list query with no number (e.g. "cases from 2024 and 2025"), it returns up to ~10 per group (year/court) — so two years yields ~20. Args: query: Raw natural-language legal query. max_results: Optional explicit total to return (hard cap 50).

search_pakistani_case_law