ChatGPT Plugin

CiteCheck

Check citation, find authority

Brand: Objection Academy

Category: Education
Primary Subcategory: Legal Research Engines

Integration details

Description

CiteCheck helps users search a focused federal, California, and New York legal search, retrieve primary-source passages, check whether citations appear in covered sources, and practice courtroom objections. It does not determine good-law status or provide legal advice.

Integration type: Plugin
Verification status: Not applicable
Platform: ChatGPT
Category: Education
Primary Subcategory: Legal Research Engines
Secondary Subcategories: None listed
Brand: Objection Academy
Access: No account required
First tracked: 2026-09-08
Tool count: 7
Geography: US

Agent DiscoverabilityChatGPT Plugin Discovery Score

ChatGPT organic discovery is live

Your score is coming

ChatGPT now suggests Plugins on its own when they match a user's request.Your Plugin Discovery Score measures how often yours appears, and it will show here as soon as it’s ready.

Sign up to track your Plugin See who ChatGPT suggests

ChatGPT recommends Airtable when a user asks it to update a CRM. — ChatGPT surfaces Airtable because it matches the user's request.

Primary Subcategory

Competing in ChatGPT Legal Research Engines

View Category

Listed in alphabetical order

Primary Subcategory

Açık Silivri HavadisComing soonGet notified

Advoga IAComing soonGet notified

AI Attorney PakistanComing soonGet notified

AI RechtshulpComing soonGet notified

AiLexLux LegalComing soonGet notified

CiteCheckComing soonGet notified

Tools

7 tools agents can invoke

Use this when the user provides public, nonconfidential citations or text and asks whether the citations appear in CiteCheck. It does not evaluate good-law status, proposition support, or the complete legal record.
check_citations
Use this when the user wants a short educational courtroom-objection practice drill. The drill is generated in the conversation and does not reveal the answer until the user responds.
create_objection_drill
Use this when the user wants an educational explanation of an evidence objection with covered primary-source passages. It is not legal advice and does not resolve a case-specific legal position.
explain_objection
Use this when the user has a CiteCheck document ID and wants its stored primary-source text and metadata.
fetch
Use this when the user wants metadata and stored passages for one CiteCheck document ID.
get_authority
Use this when the user asks for primary-source passages or needs federal, California, or New York filters. Searches only the covered CiteCheck Index; an absent result does not prove an authority does not exist.
search_authorities
Use this when the user wants to locate CiteCheck documents by keyword. Returns matching document IDs, titles, and canonical source URLs; use search_authorities when the user specifically asks for passages or jurisdiction filters.
search

FAQs

CiteCheck ChatGPT Plugin FAQ

How the directory, categories and Discoverability Score work.

Read the methodology

How do I improve CiteCheck's ChatGPT Plugin discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are CiteCheck alternatives on ChatGPT?

As of 2026-10-23, CiteCheck competes with Advoga IA, AI Attorney Pakistan, AI Rechtshulp, AiLexLux Legal, AL WAKEELO, Alizé, AnyLawyer, Appealbase and 84 more in ChatGPT Legal Research Engines, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.