CiteCheck

Check citation, find authority

Category: Education
Primary Subcategory: Legal Research Engines

Integration details

Description

CiteCheck helps users search a focused federal, California, and New York legal search, retrieve primary-source passages, check whether citations appear in covered sources, and practice courtroom objections. It does not determine good-law status or provide legal advice.

Integration type: Plugin
Verification status: Not applicable
Platform: ChatGPT
Category: Education
Primary Subcategory: Legal Research Engines
Secondary Subcategories: None listed
Brand: Objection Academy
Access: No account required
First tracked: 2026-09-08
Tool count: 8
Geography: US

ChatGPT Plugin Discovery Score

ChatGPT Plugin discovery is coming soon

ChatGPT can surface a Plugin when it matches a user's request.Your Plugin Discovery Score measures how often yours appears.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

ChatGPT recommends Airtable when a user asks it to update a CRM. — ChatGPT surfaces Airtable because it matches the user's request.

Primary Subcategory

Competing in ChatGPT Legal Research Engines

View Category

Listed in alphabetical order

Primary Subcategory

Açık Silivri HavadisComing soonGet notified

AI AttorneyComing soonGet notified

AL WAKEELOComing soonGet notified

AlizéComing soonGet notified

AppealBase™Coming soonGet notified

CiteCheckComing soonGet notified

Tools

8 tools agents can invoke

Extract supported citation formats from nonconfidential text and check whether each appears in the covered corpus. This does not evaluate good-law status or proposition support.
check_citations
Use this when the user wants a short educational courtroom-objection practice drill. The drill is generated in the conversation and does not reveal the answer until the user responds.
create_objection_drill
Use this when the user wants an educational explanation of an evidence objection with covered primary-source passages. It is not legal advice and does not resolve a case-specific legal position.
explain_objection
Retrieve citable primary-source text and metadata for an authority ID returned by search.
fetch
Retrieve metadata and stored source passages for one CiteCheck Index document.
get_authority
Return the hosted AuthorityCheck URL for source-passage and independent model review. Do not put confidential information in the link.
open_full_authority_check
Search covered federal, California, and New York evidence-law authorities and source passages. Absence from results does not prove an authority does not exist.
search_authorities
Search the covered CiteCheck Index. Use fetch with a returned ID for citable source text.
search

CiteCheck FAQ

How do I improve a ChatGPT Plugin's discoverability?

The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.

What are CiteCheck alternatives on ChatGPT?

As of 2026-09-08, CiteCheck competes with AI Attorney, AL WAKEELO, Alizé, AppealBase™, Açık Silivri Havadis, BIA Edge, CiteLaw, CourtListener, Craime, Descrybe Legal Engine, DirectCase Legal Research, ElevenFlo, F-AI Contract Template Finder, Folium Jurisprudencia Chilena, Fontis, GovQuery, IAJUS, IFG, Juridata, Lawstronaut, Legal Data Hunter, Legalcode, LegisGraph, LegisRatio, Letra da Lei, LibreJustice, Midpage Legal Research, Nylon, OpenRegs: Regulatory Research, Policy Doctor, realLaw AI, Red Judicial, Remedy Legal, Simpliciter AI, Special Education Law, TaxGraph, TaxMCP, Trellis Law, Vasara in ChatGPT Legal Research Engines, ranked by public Discoverability Score.

Where is this profile measured?

This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.