Ortexo
Romanian and EU law for Claude: legislation in force, point-in-time article versions, court decisions linked to the version they cite, and still-good-law checks.
- Brand
- Ortexo
- Category
- Operations
- Primary Subcategory
- Legal Research Engines
Integration details
Description
Ortexo connects Claude to a structured, continuously updated database of Romanian and EU law, built for legal research where it matters exactly which version of a rule applies. What Claude can do with it - Find and read legislation: look up articles and whole acts by citation or common name ("Legea 265/2022", "Codul fiscal"), or search by keyword or by meaning. - Read the law as it stood on a given date: point-in-time article versions for the major codes (Fiscal Code, Fiscal Procedure Code, Civil Code, Criminal Code, Labour Code), plus repealed and historical provisions and version-to-version comparison. - Check whether an article is still good law: whether it is in force, when it was last amended and by what, and how many decisions interpreting it rely on an older version. - Follow the citation graph: for any article, the related legislation, amending acts and the court decisions that interpret it, each tagged with the article version the court cited. - Search case law: Romanian courts, the High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ), the CJEU and General Court, and the ECHR (including judgments against Romania). - Work across Romanian and EU law: EU acts, their transposition into Romanian law, and the Romanian acts and decisions that cite them. - Verify a draft: every article cited in a text is flagged as in force, repealed, nonexistent or unverifiable. Coverage Over 170,000 Romanian acts in force; about 92,000 EU acts; about 235,000 ICCJ decisions, over 68,000 rulings from Romanian courts, 48,000 CJEU/General Court documents and 75,000 ECHR judgments. ECHR texts are in English or French; semantic search works across languages. Snapshot coverage varies by law: a date with no result means the snapshot is missing, not that the rule did not exist. Requirements An Ortexo account with an active plan is required; you sign in when you connect. Ortexo is a research tool, not legal advice: verify citations against official sources before relying on them.
- Integration type
- Connector
- Verification status
Community connector- Platform
- Claude
- Primary Subcategory
- Legal Research Engines
- Secondary Subcategories
- None listed
- Brand
- Ortexo
- Access
- Account required
- First tracked
- 2026-10-13
- Tool count
- 30
- Geography
- US
The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.
Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.
Claude Connector discovery is coming soon
Community Connectors only appear in Claude’s registry.Once verified, organic discovery begins and we can calculate your score.Read more about Community Connector verification.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
What discovery looks like

Claude can surface verified Connectors when they match a user’s Prompt.
How Claude Connector discovery works
Your Connector will compete to appear for users’ Prompts once Claude verifies it
Competing in Claude Legal Research Engines
View Category30 tools agents can invoke
Ortexo Claude Connector FAQ
How the directory, categories and Discoverability Score work.
Read the methodologyHow do I improve Ortexo's Claude Connector discoverability?
The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.
What are Ortexo alternatives on Claude?
As of 2026-10-14, Ortexo competes with 1102tools for Acquisition.gov, 1102tools for Regulations.gov, Agent M.D. method, Alizé, Alpaca Law, argüman.ai, AçıkSilivri Havadis, beschlussreif – WEG-Wissen and 111 more in Claude Legal Research Engines, ranked by public Discoverability Score.
Where is this profile measured?
This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.